Contradictory and inconsistent" statements, said the prosecution
failed to prove charges against the accused. It appears that the two, being in
the prime of their youth, were having sexual relations with each other in
youthful eagerness and nothing else," the court said. It further said,
"There is no evidence on record to suggest that the prosecutrix had given
her consent to physical relations with the accused solely on the latter's
promise to marry her or that he was having knowledge that she consented to
physical relations with him only on promise to marry her." Additional
sessions judge Virender Bhatt, while acquitting Haryana resident Vikul Bakshi
on the basis of the victim's There is no evidence on record to suggest that the
prosecutrix had given her consent to physical relations with the accused solely
on the latter's promise to marry her or that he was having knowledge that she
consented to physical relations with him only on promise to marry her."
No Comments For This Post, Be first to write a Comment.